Impact of Miscellaneous Managerial Approaches on Teachers’ Contentment and Dynamism Towards Job

  • Muhammad Saleem Akhtar The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Aslam The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Akhtar The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Keywords: Managerial Approaches, Dynamism, Contentment, Teacher's Enthusiasm, Accountability, Job Security


The purpose of this study was to investigate the diversity of education manager’s leadership approaches in relation to teacher job contentment & dynamism at the secondary level in public secondary schools in Rahimyar Khan. The independent variables were managerial approaches. The dependent variable was the teacher’s job contentment and dynamism which was measured by the use of the Teacher Job Contentment Questionnaire (TJCQ). The reliability alpha coefficient for the Education Manager’s managerial Approach Questionnaire (EMMQ) was found to be 0.943 and 0.944 for the teacher questionnaire (TJCQ) respectively. Teacher job contentment was measured using eight factors of job contentment: encouraging functioning atmosphere, supervision, synchronization, accountability, performance, job wellbeing, gratitude & trustworthiness. The target population for the study was 10 education managers, 40 teachers and 200 students from the ten public secondary schools selected from rural and urban areas equally. Comparative teacher contentment and dynamism differences results showed that teachers were highly contented & dynamic in egalitarian approach, mostly in realization oriented approach and then in contingency approach but least contentment under laissez-faire and dictatorial managerial approaches. A major implication of the study was that education manager’s leadership approach has a substantial association with teacher job contentment, therefore education managers should endeavor to use leadership approaches that give enhanced teachers’ contentment and dynamism.


• Awang, A., & Balasundran, A. R. (2002). The role of principals & headmasters in determining students’ academic excellence. In 11th National Seminar on Educational Management and Leadership. Aminuddin Baki Institute, Ministry of Education Malaysia.

• Bateman, T., Snell, S., & Konopaske, R. (2013). M: Management. McGraw-Hill Education.

• Bennell, P., & Akyeampong, A. (2007). Teacher Motivation in Sub-Sahara Africa and South Asia (Researching the Issues 71). DFID - Department of International Development.

• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. National College for school leadership.

• Corey, M. S., Corey, G., & Corey, C. (2013). Groups: Process and Practice. Cengage Learning.

• Corey, & Stephen, M. (1957). Introduction. In In-service education: the fifty-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

• Din, M. N. (2008). A study of contentment techniques used by Heads of Institutions of Higher Education and their impact on dynamism of teachers. Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

• Fook, C. Y. (2004). Kepemimpinan transformasional dan inovasi pendidikan. Kertas.

• Grauwe, P. De. (2017). Towards a behavioral theory of the exchange rate. In (eds.) Cheung, Yin-Wong and Westermann, Frank (Ed.), International Currency Exposure. CESifo Seminar series. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

• NSUBUGA, Y. K. K. (2008). Analysis of Leadership Styles and School Performance of Secondary Schools in Uganda. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.

• Sheilds, C. (2005). School leadership in the 21st century: broading the base. In Educational leadership and reform. Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.

• Ubben, D. G. C., Hughes, D. L. W., & Norris, D. C. J. (2001). The Principal: Creative Leadership for Excellence in Schools. Pearson.

How to Cite
Akhtar, M. S., Aslam, M., & Akhtar, M. (2020). Impact of Miscellaneous Managerial Approaches on Teachers’ Contentment and Dynamism Towards Job. KFUEIT Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 28-36. Retrieved from